Strike 3 Litigation

Part of the monetary effectiveness of their litigation is to reduce the time(money) to litigate by filing the same complaint for all the John Does’ throughout the country and then slapping the Attorney Name at the end to make sure that regional attorney gets their cut of whatever money they can extract from the REAL LIFE PEOPLE behind their “Doe” Lawsuit. This legal laziness allows these lawyers litigate at volume accumulating fees, commisions or whatever metric Strike 3 Holdings uses to compensate them. Im sure some of the attorneys. do this Fulltime and some Not. They probably have alot of administrative help and they proofread the final result and upload it PACER. Essentially they are treating civil litigation like how people treat porn, just another nut!!!!

The complaints are essentially the same, the most noticable change is venue, IP and attorney that filed

Here is Current Filing of case in the state of Tennessee :

Here is Current Filing of case in state of Hawaii

Note that this attorney uses a PO BOX as an address. Whenever I see someone use a PO box I instantly think, thier privacy is at upmost concern and they are engaging in a business that hurts aLot of people in one way or the other. Think of the LOW LIFE NO EHTICS landlord that hides behind an LLC and PO BOX, you never quite know who he she or they are, you can only contact them through 3rd Parties Unlike suing a car driver via their liability insurance or a corporation. This type of federal civil litigation targets individuals with limited resources and legal expertise. Moreover, these people are caught off guard and not sure whats happening.

Traditionally when a user downloads a copyrighted film for personal use, there is DMCA takedown or warning. Meaning the consumer is aware they are being watched, that their ISP obviously is not protecting thier privacy when faced against the legal apparatus of the US judicial system. So the ” infringer” has plenty of warning. STRIKE 3, STRIKES WITHOUT ANY WARNING BECAUSE THEY DONT MITIGATE, THEY LET THE DOWNLOADS CONTINUE , THEY LITIGATE FOR COMPENSATION.

They stop monitoring and STRIKE at a sweet spot where they feel “ok we can reliably get 10k-20k on average in this area of the country; if we try to get too greedy the defendant will be forced to litigate or self-litigate and we won’t get nothing”. So the idea is RELIABLE SETTLEMENTS in terms of dealing with individuals. They are just another part of their business model in addition to hardcore pornography.