There is some speculation that in fact the ISP collects a fee for each request of user information the court compels them to provide strike 3 Holdings. That kinda makes sense right! The ISP gets a fee, strike 3 gets their lawsuit defendant/victim/target; all is happy. The ISP gets to throw their hands up and say “its not us, the court is forcing us provide this”. There is no incentive for them to quash these request, furthermore because many ISPs dont have any regional competition and internet access use is an essential utility, they dont really worry about a consumer running to a more privacy minded provider. Take a Look at this older with Malibu Media( a close cousin to strike 3 Holdings) document:

Some of the same blood sucking lawyers that worked with malibu are working with strike 3

Posted in

Leave a comment